ChatGPT

dots by openai aixploria a row of spheres on a low tray

Dots by OpenAI Is Now Available on AIxploria

Dots by OpenAI reached AIxploria less than 15 hours after DevDay. We checked the card against OpenAI’s launch post, help centre and safety post: most claims hold, but it tags a paid-only agent as Freemium, mixes personal and specialist dots, shares its rank badge with Meta’s Muse and misses the UK route through Business Premium.

Read more
openai spaces human agent collaboration devday a open doorway with a door ajar

OpenAI Develops Spaces for Potential Human and Agent Collaboration

A redacted announcement string shows OpenAI is working on Spaces, which TestingCatalog speculates could be a shared environment where people and AI agents work on generated artefacts. We set out what leaked, the DevDay sessions that point the same way, how it would extend Canvas, shared projects and workspace agents, and what businesses should decide first.

Read more
openai code strings dots ai agents evidence a magnifying glass

OpenAI Code Strings Suggest Upcoming AI Agents Named Dots

Strings found in recent ChatGPT builds suggest OpenAI’s upcoming personal agents will be called Dots. We look at the evidence itself: what code strings are, what each Dots string proves and does not, how the name moved from aeon to o to dots in eight days, and how often September’s leaks turned into launches.

Read more
openai injunction florida ag stop model development a courthouse with columns

Florida AG Requests Emergency Order to Stop OpenAI Model Development

Florida Attorney General James Uthmeier has asked a Highlands County court to stop OpenAI developing new AI models without independent third-party approval, bar minors from ChatGPT and strip its human-like language. We set out the six requested restraints, the case history, the incidents and insider statements the 49-page motion relies on, the legal test, OpenAI’s response and what it means for businesses.

Read more
ai summaries misleading distort human memory a yield sign on a post

Misleading AI-Generated Summaries Can Distort Human Memory

A Georgetown and University of Washington study found that a ChatGPT summary with one wrong detail cut correct recall of a traffic sign from 83.6% to 44.8%, whether people thought AI or a human wrote it. Every AI summary the team generated also omitted central facts. We explain the method, the numbers, the 50-year-old memory research behind them, and the controls organisations need.

Read more
CHAT