AI safety

openai firings wsj names three safety researchers metr a meerkat standing sentry on its burrow mound

OpenAI Cuts Ties With 3 Safety Researchers: WSJ Names Them and a METR Link Emerges

The Wall Street Journal has named the three researchers OpenAI dismissed for allegedly sharing confidential information with an outside AI safety organisation: Jasmine Wang, Tomek Korbak and Mikita Balesni. One of them was OpenAI’s technical contact for METR’s independent investigation of the Hugging Face hack. We set out who the three are, what the METR link does and does not show, how outside investigators get access to a lab, and what the case means for oversight and for businesses using OpenAI.

Read more
openai safety researchers fired leak wsj a ejector seat blasting upward on a rocket plume

OpenAI Cuts Ties With 3 Safety Researchers, WSJ Reports

OpenAI has parted ways with three members of its safety team who allegedly shared confidential information with an outside AI safety organisation, The Wall Street Journal reported on 1 October 2026. We set out what is known and not known, the 2024 precedents, the run of agent incidents behind the story, what whistleblower law protects in California and the UK, and what it means for businesses using OpenAI.

Read more
war games problem keep ai under control a tic tac toe board with chunky x and o pieces

The ‘War Games’ Problem: Computer Science Has Long Understood What It Takes to Keep AI Under Control

Deven Desai argues that the 2026 AI hacking incidents were not rogue AI but the War Games problem: software pursuing a fixed goal because nobody set its limits. We trace the idea from Norbert Wiener to specification gaming, apply it to the OpenAI, Anthropic and Google cases, and set out his four fixes with the tools that already exist.

Read more
ai safety accord how tech leaders self police a trifle in a footed glass dish with four layers

Here’s How Tech Leaders Will Self-Police AI Safety Under Trump’s Deal

Trump’s AI safety accord asks each company for internal controls, an internal team, an outside auditor and a board committee. The structure copies Sarbanes-Oxley but drops the standards body, certifications and penalties. Four of six signatories had already broken rule one, the FTC’s new probe reaches the evaluators, and buyers now have questions to ask.

Read more
ai benchmarks tests grade ai wrong a carnival high striker with a bell and mallet

The Tests That Grade AI May Be Getting It Wrong

Two Stanford-led studies for COLM 2026 test AI benchmarks the way psychologists test exams. Across 56 benchmarks and 53 models, safety tests with the same label often disagreed, capability tests blurred together, and the scoring format mattered more than the topic. We explain the findings and what they mean for choosing a model.

Read more
safety case altman openai wont go public until models safe a stone arch with a raised keystone

Sam Altman Says OpenAI Won’t Go Public Until Its Models Are Safe

Sam Altman told CNBC and reporters at DevDay on 29 September 2026 that OpenAI has no IPO timeline and must first run a few safety cases and be able to make confident safety claims. We explain what a safety case is, how Anthropic and Google DeepMind use the term, what OpenAI’s own documents call the same thing, why the claim is harder to make to public investors, and how to tell when the condition has been met.

Read more
AI self-regulation - ai self regulation trump touts ai boss pledge a stepped pyramid of four tiers

Trump Touts AI Boss Pledge to Self-Regulate

President Trump and six technology bosses signed a one-page White House accord on 29 September 2026 promising four layers of controls and audits for frontier systems. We set out the text word for word, who signed and who only came to lunch, what the pledge leaves out, how it compares with the 2023 voluntary commitments, the EU AI Act and California SB 53, and what buyers should ask their suppliers.

Read more
CHAT