runtime trust

execution governance identity permissions ai agent behavior a solid pipe valve handwheel

Identity and Permissions Aren’t Enough to Govern AI Agent Behavior

A VentureBeat article published in partnership with Box argues that identity and permissions aren’t enough to govern AI agent behaviour, because access controls decide what an agent can reach while saying nothing about what it should do once inside. Built around an interview with Box CISO Heather Ceylan, the piece proposes execution governance: task-scoped permissions minted per task, a content layer whose classification and metadata are enforced rather than advisory, a three-tier approval model sorted by reversibility, and behavioural baselines built for agents rather than people. This article walks through the argument, the SailPoint survey numbers behind it, the 2026 sandbox-escape incidents that made it concrete, and how it interlocks with agent identity and runtime trust.

Read more
runtime trust ai agents drift expose data memory poisoned a solid ship anchor

AI Agents That Pass Authentication Can Still Drift, Expose Data, or Get Memory-Poisoned

A VentureBeat guest essay argues that AI agents which pass authentication can still drift from their objective, expose data and have their memory poisoned, because authentication verifies who an agent is while runtime trust verifies what it is doing. This piece explains the five runtime threats, the five-pillar runtime trust model (intent validation, behavioural monitoring, policy enforcement, least-privilege execution, human oversight), how it maps onto the six deployment gates in the companion essay, the 2026 research measuring memory-poisoning success rates, the OWASP and MITRE ATLAS entries that name each threat, the survey figures on the post-authentication control gap, what Microsoft, AWS and Cloudflare have shipped, and a roadmap a UK business can run with the tools it already owns.

Read more
CHAT