Navier-Stokes

math community openai keeps bulldozing mathematicians a bulldozer with a front blade

OpenAI Keeps Bulldozing Mathematicians

The Verge spoke to Martin Hairer, one of the nine mathematicians on the new Advisory Group on Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, as OpenAI prepares to release more than 100 results from an unreleased model. We set out who sits on AGMAI, what OpenAI and the group have each promised, why the math community feels bulldozed, and what a responsible release process would look like.

Read more
ai math solving greatest problems art form a artists easel with a canvas

Solving Math’s Greatest Problems Was an Art Form. Then Came AI

OpenAI’s brute-force Navier-Stokes proof has mathematicians asking what AI is doing to a field that has always worked like an art form. We trace the argument from G. H. Hardy to the Erdős problems, check the numbers behind the declaration and the compute bill, and draw lessons for any expert workforce.

Read more
math advisory group openai 100 open problems a math advisory group amphitheatre concentric steps

OpenAI Forms Math Advisory Group as Its AI Resolves More Than 100 Open Problems

OpenAI announced on 21 September 2026 that an internal model has resolved more than 100 long-standing open mathematical problems, and that an independent advisory group hosted at the Institute for Advanced Study will now advise on how such results are assessed and released. Ten days earlier, Fields Medallists published a declaration calling the goals of AI companies and mathematicians “severely misaligned.” This article checks both name lists, sets out the compute figures OpenAI published for the Navier-Stokes proof, and identifies the one thing the advisory group is explicitly forbidden from advising on.

Read more
openai math mathematicians want proof didnt use their work a nautilus spiral seashell

Mathematicians Want Proof OpenAI Didn’t Use Their Work

Mathematicians want proof that OpenAI didn’t use their work. After OpenAI said an internal model solved the Navier–Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, NYU’s Tristan Buckmaster asked whether his Codex sessions had trained it, and TU Dresden’s Andreas Thom asked the same about his ChatGPT chats and OpenAI’s non-sofic group result. OpenAI says no person or agent looked at their data, but it cannot rule out that de-identified data from their product use helped improve its models. We set out the timeline, the compute arithmetic, what each side claims, what OpenAI’s data controls actually cover, what real proof would look like, and what the dispute means for any business that puts unpublished work into AI tools.

Read more
CHAT