AI Training Data

nyt lawsuit microsoft openai knew news content theft a rolled newspaper cylinder lying flat

NYT Alleges Microsoft, OpenAI Knew Using News Content Was Theft

A 92-page public version of the News Plaintiffs’ summary judgment brief, filed on 17 September 2026, quotes Microsoft’s Director of Applied Science Brent Hecht on “an astonishing theft of unprecedented proportions”. In full, the sentence forecasts how millions of people would see AI training. We read the brief and Microsoft’s own memorandum: the five stages of copying alleged, the datasets and counts, the “horse trading” between Microsoft and OpenAI, Copilot click-through drops of 83 to 93 per cent, the Bloom filter behind the “accidental cover up” line, and Microsoft’s 8.2-million-log defence.

Read more
seattle times lawsuit openai microsoft copyright infringement a lectern with sloping top board

Two More News Organizations Sue OpenAI and Microsoft for Copyright Infringement

The Seattle Times Company and Newsday LLC sued OpenAI, eight affiliated OpenAI entities and Microsoft Corporation on 4 September 2026 in the Southern District of New York, docketed as No. 1:26-cv-07644. The 38-page complaint pleads seven counts — direct and vicarious copyright infringement, two DMCA claims over stripped copyright management information, and federal, Washington and New York trademark dilution — and asks the court to destroy the training datasets and models built on the plaintiffs’ journalism. This is a working read of the filing: the datasets named, the 88-word Boeing 737 MAX passage a model returned verbatim, the 47% referral traffic collapse behind the harm claim, the $300 million licensing market the plaintiffs were left out of, and where the case sits against the consolidated New York Times litigation that reached summary judgment the same day.

Read more
ai copyright training models on copyrighted books a stack of closed books

Is It Legal to Train AI Models on Copyrighted Books? It’s Complicated

Is it legal to train AI models on copyrighted books? Courts say it’s complicated. This guide walks through the $1.5 billion Anthropic settlement and its 91% claim rate, the fair use four-factor test, the scoreboard of rulings from Bartz v. Anthropic to Kadrey v. Meta and Thomson Reuters v. Ross, why the UK’s March 2026 report kept the status quo after Getty’s hollow High Court win, what the US Copyright Office’s Part 3 report concluded before its author was fired and reinstated, and the practical questions every business using or building AI should be asking about indemnities, provenance and output ownership.

Read more
paying artists embrace ai pippa royalties a royalty coins flowing into artist palette

Paying Artists to Embrace AI: Inside Pippa’s Royalty Model

Text-to-video startup Pippa pays illustrators $0.005 per image and $0.003 per second of video, plus a 5% share of subscription revenue. It is the clearest test yet of whether compensation alone can bring artists over to generative AI, or whether consent, credit and stylistic control were always the bigger obstacles.

Read more
CHAT